![]() ![]() “Assembly Bill 32 was enacted to protect the health and welfare of Californians and recognized the federal government’s own documented concerns with for-profit, private prisons and detention facilities.” The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who authored the bill as an assemblyman, said it was “deeply disappointed” with the outcome: ![]() Murguia, along with two other judges disagreed, asserting that AB32 is valid because the bill does not directly regulate or discriminate against the federal government. California can not exert this level of control.”Ĭhief Justice Mary H. Nguyen found that AB32 “would override the federal government’s decision, pursuant to discretion conferred by Congress, to use private contractors to run its immigration detention centers. ![]() GEO, who had only recently signed 15-year contracts worth $6.5 billion, stated the bill would cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual revenue.Īs the Los Angeles Times reports Judge Jacqueline H. The case began when government contractor the GEO Group and the federal government sued California over AB32. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that the 2019 bill violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which prohibits states from overruling federal laws. A federal court ruled Monday that California’s Assembly Bill 32, which bans private prisons and immigrant detention centers, is unconstitutional. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |